http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking ... t-dowsing/Tom Ough wrote:"You can’t look this much like Paddington Bear, I thought, and be a quack. You just can’t. It’s impossible."
Ian
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking ... t-dowsing/Tom Ough wrote:"You can’t look this much like Paddington Bear, I thought, and be a quack. You just can’t. It’s impossible."
A pseudo-skeptical explanation for the movement of the rods. The term pre-dates the birth of modern psychology proper. It even pre-dates the birth of Sigmund Freud. It was originally used to explain table-tipping. It may (or may not) be relevant to dowsing but does not explain the cause of the dowsing reaction. I will not use the nomenclature of the debunkers, who seem to think that all dowsers assume that the movement of the rods is magical. It's a misrepresentation of dowsing and dowsers.DarkChestofWonders wrote:Good find Ian.
Nice explanation of the Ideomotor effect too.
According to Wikipedia:DarkChestofWonders wrote:Ian,
I think I see what you mean.
Just so that I understand this properly, the ideomotor effect should not be attached to dowsing, correct?
I've not looked to or tried to explain it myself, but thanks anyway for your explanation. I didn't realise either that the "ideomotor" word was that old, it sounds like a more modern word.
I know dowsing works and that's it for me.
(the pseudo-skeptics are the ones who write the Wikipedia page, so if it's wrong blame them!)"The term Ideomotor was first used in a scientific paper discussing the means through which these spiritualistic phenomena produced effect, by William Benjamin Carpenter in 1852"