I actually came across this on an old version of the Wikipedia Dowsing page, but it was subsequently removed. It relates to theNaturwissenschaften
May 1996, Volume 83, Issue 5, pp 232-235
The dowsing data defy Enright's unfavorable verdict
scientific work of Prof Hans Dieter Betz and served to defend Betz's work
against the rebuttal written by J. Enwright (a CSICOP regular who printed his rebuttal in the Skeptical Enquirer)
I haven't read this yet, but why was it removed? Naturwissenschaften not respectable enough for you, Jimmy? Perhaps you could tell THEM why..?