John Irwin wrote:
Can anyone come up with a better definition? It raises many questions!
It certainly does. The problem with any definition of dowsing is that all the definitions we know of either:
a) relate to some specific theory of the mechanism of dowsing, or
b) exclude the possibility of other competing theories, or
c) are too general to be of any use.
An example of each type:
a) "Radiesthesia" (French term) - specific to the theory of radiation from objects
b) "divining" - excludes the possibility of radiesthesia-type theories
c) "A means of finding out" (BSD definition) - too broad
At this point it occurs to me that all type a) theories are also type b) theories. True by definition.
There is also the problem of whether or not one should be politically correct. If your own personal preference excludes some other form of dowsing then the end result could be factionalism, with everyone huddled together in opposite corners of the room according to which "gang" you prefer to be with.
Personally I think dowsers should stick together and try to be broad-minded or at least tolerant of the views of other dowsers. We should not fall prey to any propaganda that divides the BSD into sects like "elves and fairies" vs. "pragmatists/scientists".
Anything which could divide the BSD is bad in my view. Therefore I prefer a definition like "a means of finding out", even if it's a bit too broad in practice.
Ian